Multiple Choice
The Katz v.United States (1967) case,while shifting the Fourth Amendment inquiry from property rights to privacy rights,did not result in a lot of reversals of previously decided cases.Why were there not a lot of reversals following the decision?
A) privacy protection requires a reference to "place"
B) a change in focus applies only to future cases and no reversals can occur
C) no cases have come before the court requiring a reversal
D) a reversal would require a constitutional amendment
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q31: Assuming that no exception to the warrant
Q35: Which of the following is not reflective
Q36: Other Fourth Amendment considerations, such as warrants,
Q38: The preference that a search and/or seizure
Q39: Some courts require additional information to establish
Q41: Third party information is often referred to
Q43: A criminal informant's credibility is never presumed
Q45: The common law approach to applying the
Q48: The U.S. Supreme Court has a strong
Q54: In terms of applying the privacy right