Multiple Choice
In R. Williams Construction Co. v OSHRC, a trench collapsed at a construction site, killing one worker, and severely injuring another. A hydraulic jack supporting the wall had been removed, and the walls of the trench were not sloped, as required by OSHA regulations. The construction firm argued that, although it did not know what the OSHA requirements were, its employees had much work experience and common sense, and they talked about safety "all the time." The OSHRC ruled:
A) for the employer, because of the several years of experience of its workers
B) for the employer, because the employees frequently talked about safety
C) for the workers, because there was a death and a serious injury
D) for the workers, because OSHA regulations applied, and it is not a defense that the firm did not know about OSHA regulations
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Which of the following is NOT true
Q3: You work in a large office in
Q4: The OSH Act created two new agencies.
Q5: Workers' compensation requires that for an injured
Q6: Which of the following is true of
Q8: Regarding Workers' Compensation, which of the following
Q9: Ergonomic hazards _:<br>A)are partially addressed by OSHA's
Q10: A woman wrenched her back participating in
Q11: The elements of a specific violation of
Q12: Why is each of the following good