Multiple Choice
Would a letter written after the execution of a contract and which contained agreements different from those in the written contract be admissible under the parol evidence rule?
A) No, because it explains the agreement.
B) No, because it contradicts the terms of the contract.
C) No, because it changes the agreement.
D) Yes, it would be admissible, because it is subsequent to the written agreement.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: The parol evidence rule does not prevent
Q17: Parol evidence refers only to any oral
Q26: Which of the following is an exception
Q28: Which of the following would NOT require
Q33: Under the UCC, _ refers to the
Q37: Under the Restatement and the Code, when
Q39: The parol evidence rule applies to partially
Q40: An employment contract that is in any
Q50: Under the majority rule, the test under
Q63: A number of courts have used the