The Court in Furlong V

Multiple Choice

The court in Furlong v.Alpha Chi Omega Sorority held that:

A) the law required the sorority to accept Furlong's offer of compromise.
B) rejection of the goods was not rightful even though the sorority seasonably notified the seller within a reasonable time since notice was by phone.
C) the UCC did not apply to this situation.
D) the design specifications were part of the basis of the bargain and as such became an express warranty.