Multiple Choice
The case, State of Qatar v.First American Bank of Virginia , held that:
A) a stolen check which is indorsed in blank cannot be freely negotiated by the bearer.
B) the phrase "for deposit only" effectively limits the depositary bank to handle the instrument in a manner consistent with the transaction.
C) the phrase "for deposit only" is not an effective restrictive indorsement.
D) depositary banks are not required to handle checks consistent with the restrictive indorsement.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: To acquire the preferential rights of a
Q28: Michael issues a check to Paula. She
Q31: "Order paper" is negotiated by delivery only.
Q50: A restrictive indorsement:<br>A) always destroys negotiability.<br>B) disclaims
Q52: Ricardo is the holder of a check
Q54: Indorsements with ineffective restrictions include which of
Q57: Marty Sandidge wrote a check payable to
Q59: If the instrument is order paper, how
Q68: The requirements for negotiation are the same
Q72: A negotiation is void if the transaction