Multiple Choice
Would a letter written after the execution of a contract and which contained agreements different from those in the written contract be admissible under the parol evidence rule?
A) No, because it contradicts the terms of the contract.
B) No, because it changes the agreement.
C) No, because it explains the agreement.
D) Yes, it would be admissible, because it is subsequent to the written agreement.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: Abco Corp. is building a new office
Q19: The suretyship provision rule within the statute
Q20: The parol evidence rule does not prevent
Q21: Under the UCC, _ refers to the
Q22: The executor-administrator provision applies to promises of
Q24: In which of the following situations does
Q25: The purpose of the statute of frauds
Q26: An oral contract for the transfer of
Q27: Which of the following is an exception
Q28: Sam orally agreed to sell his house