Multiple Choice
A written, integrated contract contains a provision that states it will be effective for a "year." The plaintiff in a lawsuit claims that a "year" is obviously 12 months. The defendant claims that the contract meant a 10-month school year. In this case:
A) parol evidence cannot be used to explain the term, because the plain meaning of a "year" is 12 months.
B) parol evidence cannot be used to explain the term, because it is in an integrated document.
C) the term "year" is ambiguous, and the parties can bring in parol evidence to clarify their intent.
D) parol evidence cannot be used, because the contract contains an express term that could have been changed by the parties prior to the contract's execution.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: The purpose of the statute of frauds
Q26: An oral contract for the transfer of
Q27: Which of the following is an exception
Q28: Sam orally agreed to sell his house
Q29: Under the majority rule, the test under
Q31: The statute of frauds has to do
Q32: Under the UCC parol evidence rule, usage
Q33: An example of language creating a suretyship
Q34: Which of the following is untrue with
Q35: Parol evidence refers only to any oral