Multiple Choice
Which of the following best describes the significance of Groh v. Ramirez (2004) ?
A) It illustrates the importance of paying attention to the details of the warrant before searching.
B) It explains the significance of constitutional issues regarding vehicle searches.
C) It illustrates the legality of law enforcement officers handcuffing citizens during searches of their vehicles or homes.
D) It explains the need for a warrant when conducting wire taps on telephones in both private and public areas.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: School officials may search students in public
Q3: The issue of when an officer may
Q4: Defining a _ uses a two-pronged test
Q5: Searches with a warrant are:<br>A) presumed to
Q6: While the terms may be similar, legally
Q7: Once given, consent may be revoked at
Q8: Using the three criteria for the plain
Q9: Routine searches at our national borders require:<br>A)
Q10: United States v. Warshak affirmed:<br>A) that mobility
Q11: Police officers who have established probable cause