In Gaskin V.Stumm Handel GmbH,the District Court Ruled

Multiple Choice

In Gaskin v.Stumm Handel GmbH,the District Court ruled:

A) that employment contracts must be in writing.
B) that the plaintiff was excused from performing a contract written in German because he understood only English.
C) that the contract was unconscionable because it was written in a language foreign to the plaintiff.
D) that the plaintiff's signing of a jural document makes the signatory conclusively bound.