menu-iconExamlexExamLexServices

Discover

Ask a Question
  1. All Topics
  2. Topic
    Business
  3. Study Set
    Business Law and the Regulation of Business Study Set 3
  4. Exam
    Exam 19: Introduction to Sales and Leases
  5. Question
    The Case of Construction Associates, Inc
Solved

The Case of Construction Associates, Inc

Question 55

Question 55

Multiple Choice

The case of Construction Associates, Inc. v. Fargo Water Equipment Co. illustrates the doctrine of:


A) course of dealing.
B) unconscionability.
C) usage of trade.
D) a transaction outside the Code.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q9: A contract to purchase stocks and bonds

Q9: The common law "mirror image" rule has

Q15: What is a "merchant?" Identify four provisions

Q17: Unless an auction is advertised or announced

Q31: If a UCC contract does not contain

Q49: Davis Co. and Ruby Creations enter an

Q50: If a contract does not comply with

Q54: The doctrine of unconscionability has evolved through

Q60: Amendments to UCC Articles 2 and 2A

Q66: Under the CISG, contracts for the sale

Examlex

ExamLex

About UsContact UsPerks CenterHomeschoolingTest Prep

Work With Us

Campus RepresentativeInfluencers

Links

FaqPricingChrome Extension

Download The App

Get App StoreGet Google Play

Policies

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceHonor CodeCommunity Guidelines

Scan To Download

qr-code

Copyright © (2025) ExamLex LLC.

Privacy PolicyTerms Of ServiceHonor CodeCommunity Guidelines