Essay
Michael issues a check to Paula. She negotiates the check to Hal as payment for a used television set. Hal has no notice of any claims or defenses and takes the check in good faith. Hal indorses the check and gives it to his son as a birthday present. Is Hal's son a holder in due course? What rights does he have with respect to the check? If Michael has a defense of fraud in the inducement against Paula, can he use that defense against Hal or Hal's son?
Correct Answer:

Verified
Hal's son is not a holder in due course ...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q23: To acquire the preferential rights of a
Q24: Sharp Finance Company has furnished Keith with
Q25: A negotiation to transfer an instrument can
Q26: Whether a transfer is by assignment or
Q27: Kripps, who is a holder in due
Q29: Opal had a check for $294 made
Q31: "Order paper" is negotiated by delivery only.
Q33: A holder need not actually have the
Q34: The customary manner of disclaiming the indorser's
Q49: The transfer of a nonnegotiable promise or