Multiple Choice
The case of VonHoldt v.Barba & Barba Construction, Inc.held that:
A) the implied warranty of habitability does not include actions against a builder brought by a subsequent purchaser for latent defects in an addition to a home.
B) the plaintiff's complaint should not have been dismissed by the lower court.
C) when a builder makes a significant addition to a previously built home, an action for damages resulting from latent defects affecting habitability exists under the doctrine of implied warranty of habitability.
D) All of these.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: A special warranty deed will give the
Q7: When a contract involving the sale of
Q17: Someone who expressly assumes a mortgage is
Q26: In most states, it is not necessary
Q29: A doctrine allowing a mortgagor to relieve
Q40: Latosha grants a quitclaim deed to some
Q52: The seller's warranty that he has marketable
Q54: Marketable title means that the title is
Q71: In a notice-race state:<br>A) an unrecorded deed
Q72: A deed ordinarily contains all of the