Matching
Match the following
Premises:
how convincing something must be
Responses:
judgment proof
standard of proof
proximate cause
thin-skull rule
duty to mitigate damages
superseding cause
preexisting condition
highly extraordinary
actual cause
intervening cause
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
judgment proof
standard of proof
proximate cause
thin-skull rule
duty to mitigate damages
superseding cause
preexisting condition
highly extraordinary
actual cause
intervening cause
Premises:
judgment proof
standard of proof
proximate cause
thin-skull rule
duty to mitigate damages
superseding cause
preexisting condition
highly extraordinary
actual cause
intervening cause
Responses:
Related Questions
Q2: A plaintiff with a high vulnerability to
Q5: The standard of proof in most negligence
Q6: You can always determine actual cause through
Q11: Match the following
Q12: The two components of proximate cause are<br>A)
Q17: Match the following
Q18: Match the following
Q19: Match the following
Q22: The manner in which the injury occurs
Q27: Under the mitigation-of-damages rule, the defendant will