Matching
Match the following
Premises:
doctrine of avoidable consequences
Responses:
intervening cause
thin-skull rule
actual cause
duty to mitigate damages
superseding cause
judgment proof
preexisting condition
highly extraordinary
proximate cause
standard of proof
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
intervening cause
thin-skull rule
actual cause
duty to mitigate damages
superseding cause
judgment proof
preexisting condition
highly extraordinary
proximate cause
standard of proof
Premises:
intervening cause
thin-skull rule
actual cause
duty to mitigate damages
superseding cause
judgment proof
preexisting condition
highly extraordinary
proximate cause
standard of proof
Responses:
Related Questions
Q2: A plaintiff with a high vulnerability to
Q5: The standard of proof in most negligence
Q6: You can always determine actual cause through
Q12: The two components of proximate cause are<br>A)
Q14: Match the following
Q15: An intervening cause<br>A)is always a superseding cause<br>B)determines
Q22: The manner in which the injury occurs
Q27: Under the mitigation-of-damages rule, the defendant will
Q29: Legal cause is established<br>A)if the intervening cause
Q31: When is an intervening criminal human force