Any Evidence Obtained by Law Enforcement Officers in Violation of the Fourth

Multiple Choice

Any evidence obtained by law enforcement officers in violation of the Fourth Amendment guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures is not admissible in a criminal trial to prove guilt; this rule was applied by the United States Supreme Court to the states in 1961 in

A) Mapp v. Ohio.
B) In re Winship.
C) Weeks v. United States.
D) Graham v. Conner.