Solved

This Case Held That Criminal Defendants Have No Constitutional Right

Question 66

Multiple Choice

This case held that criminal defendants have no constitutional right to introduce expert testimonial evidence that may passed a polygraph examination.


A) United States v. Scheffer
B) Frye v. United States
C) United States v. Posado
D) People v. Baynes

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q61: "Experiments" for the jury needs to be

Q62: Obtaining a DNA sample is intrusive and

Q63: Polygraph evidence is<br>A) never permitted in court.<br>B)

Q64: A police officer's badge is a/an<br>A) profile

Q65: Evidence, such as maps, charts, and reconstructions,

Q67: Which one of the following introduced at

Q68: This term describes evidence that must have

Q69: Real evidence is protected by the Fifth

Q70: Demonstrative evidence appears throughout the Federal Rules

Q71: The purpose of the best evidence rule