Multiple Choice
Luck points out that one argument seems to imply that, as long as a game allowed you to molest people of all different ages, it would be OK to play it. Which argument is this?
A) The "social acceptability" argument
B) The "competition not the kill" argument
C) The "significant likelihoods" argument
D) The "unfairly singling out a group for harm" argument
E) The "special status of children" argument
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: Why shouldn't we say that harming a
Q17: What does Zema mean when he says
Q18: What's Zema's point in talking about Sally
Q19: Why does Luck think that most of
Q20: Review Phillip Zema's three premises that support
Q22: Which of the following is NOT a
Q23: Luck argues that those who engage in
Q24: Which argument would be akin to asserting
Q25: Zema grants that students, free of coercion,
Q26: The Gamer's Dilemma is that:<br>A) We should