Solved

This Case Held That People, Not Places, Are Protected from Government

Question 55

Multiple Choice

This case held that people, not places, are protected from government intrusion whenever they have a reasonable expectation of privacy.

A) Terry v. Ohio.
B) Katz v. United States.
C) Illinois v. Gates.
D) Florida v. Bostick.

Related Questions

Q50: Which of the following is not one

Q51: An arrest is more invasive than a

Q52: Traffic enforcement can vary greatly by jurisdiction.

Q53: According to Egon Bittner, one of the

Q54: The structure of law enforcement agencies is

Q56: This mode of policing emphasizes enforcement of

Q57: "Police officer as soldier" is a good

Q58: The right to privacy does not extend

Q59: This is under the control of an

Q60: List the two advantages and one disadvantage