Multiple Choice
Suppose the detective knows Bob's fingerprints are found at the scene of the murder, and the detective thinks this fact is a reason to think Bob is the murderer. But suppose the detective is informed that the murder scene is where Bob goes to work every day. The detective no longer thinks the fingerprints count as evidence against Bob. The detective's reasoning is an example of
A) simple deduction.
B) reasons holism.
C) theory-centered approach.
D) pragmatic reasoning.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Can moral problems (always) be resolved without
Q2: Ethical relativism and ethical constructivism differ in
Q3: What, if anything, can we conclude from
Q5: Which of the following is a conceptual
Q6: Are the commands of the NSPE Code
Q7: Does a professional association that revises its
Q8: Which of the following inferences could serve
Q9: One problem with ethical relativism is that<br>A)
Q10: Mackie's error theory maintains<br>A) there are no
Q11: An ethical constructivist would deny<br>A) moral statements