Solved

Casuists Argue That Any New Case Where Moral Judgment Is

Question 23

Multiple Choice

Casuists argue that any new case where moral judgment is required can be analyzed by

A) the unique features of the case.
B) similarity to a paradigmatic case.
C) a general moral principle.
D) norms of the culture.

Related Questions

Q15: Ethical theories<br>A) make general claims about what

Q16: Mackie argues against ethical objectivism from the

Q17: What is the problem with the inference

Q18: Which of the following is not among

Q19: Are some moral rules universally valid-that is,

Q20: Domain-specific principles<br>A) are a form of particularism.<br>B)

Q21: An ethical expressivist would understand the sentence

Q22: According to David Hume's is-ought thesis,<br>A) we

Q24: One major objection to the theory-centered approach

Q25: Which best describes the commitment of an