Multiple Choice
Which of the following statements about the interpretation of exemption clauses is false?
A) An exemption clause can be interpreted in different ways, depending on which party seeks to enforce it.
B) An exemption clause may not be used to escape liability arising from a fundamental breach, that is, a breach which negates the benefit the innocent party expected to obtain from the contract.
C) Clauses which completely exclude the liability of one of the contract parties are construed more strictly than clauses that merely limit his liability.
D) None of the options given is correct.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: According to the Canada Steamship rules (Canada
Q2: Highland Supermarkets has come up with a
Q4: Metalworks Ltd wishes to purchase a machine
Q5: In Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v. West
Q6: The courts imply terms from the factual
Q7: In the past month, Anglo Lumber Co
Q8: Where a contract is written, parties can
Q9: Standard form contracts may not be used
Q10: In Investors Compensation Scheme v West Bromwich,
Q11: Which of the following statements is true?<br>A)