Multiple Choice
The ratio of Pagett [1983] is which of the following:
A) That the act of taking V hostage was a necessary condition for her death (or a causa sine qua non) and thus Pagett was guilty of manslaughter?
B) That the police officers had broken the chain of causation because they had acted unreasonably and thus Pagett was not guilty of manslaughter.
C) That in order to constitute a novus actus interveniens, a third party intervention had to be voluntary, ie: free, deliberate and informed, e.g.: not a reasonable act in self-preservation or an act done in performance of a legal duty.
D) That causation is always a question of law.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A stranger hammers on your front door
Q3: The ratio of Stone & Dobinson is
Q4: A defendant who commits a crime is
Q5: The ratio of Airedale NHS Trust v
Q6: A throws her baby on the floor
Q7: D hits V intending to harm her
Q8: D injures V's leg and a surgeon
Q9: V spent the weekend with D whom
Q10: In medical cases, which of the following