Multiple Choice
Cheshire Calhoun | Standing for Something
Calhoun presents the differences between personal and social virtues as well as those that are both. Integrity, according to Calhoun, is best understood as a social virtue, since much that is relevant to integrity cannot be explained merely from a personal point of view. She explains why hypocrisy, the shame of failure, and our support of the courageous are all best understood within the context of our relation to others in society.
-The fact that hypocrites lack integrity, according to Calhoun, is best understood in the context of how they
A) pretend commitment to their own ideals.
B) undermine their own ability to be deceptive.
C) deliberately mislead us or others.
D) sustain pretense about their own identities.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q88: Bernard Williams | Politics and Moral Character<br>Williams
Q89: Case 6.1: Charles F. Squire, "Is It
Q90: Thomas Nagel | Ruthlessness in Public Life<br>Nagel
Q91: Bernard Williams | Politics and Moral Character<br>Williams
Q92: Robert C. Solomon and Fernando Flores |
Q94: Bernard Williams | Politics and Moral Character<br>Williams
Q95: Robert C. Solomon and Fernando Flores |
Q96: Michael Davis | Some Paradoxes of Whistleblowing<br>Davis
Q97: Ronald Duska | Whistleblowing and Employee Loyalty<br>The
Q98: Lynne McFall | Integrity<br>McFall starts with definitions