Essay
Michael Huemer believes that the current taxation exploits the wealthy. He affirms:
Many people assume as a matter of course that "the rich" or "the super-rich" as a class are immoral, that they are taking advantage of the rest of us, that they are failing to do "their fair share" for society. The truth is the exact opposite: It is the rest of us who refuse to do our fair share. It is we who are exploiting the rich. Through our representatives, we impose tax laws that force the wealthy to carry the entire burden of paying for government and then some.
In your essay, explain what Huemer means when he talks about exploitation in this context. Then, think of a reasonable criticism of Huemer's understanding of exploitation. How might someone respond to him, arguing that the behavior he describes is not an unjust, exploitative act? What kind of understanding of exploitation would you have to adopt in order to disagree with Huemer on this point?
Correct Answer:

Verified
Explain Michael Huemer's worry that prog...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q1: Both Verbeek and Huemer agree with which
Q2: In his essay, Verbeek suggests that a
Q3: In his section "What Is a Fair
Q5: Throughout his essay, Huemer uses an example
Q6: In his reply, Huemer argues that even
Q7: In his reply, Verbeek affirms that Huemer
Q8: In his essay, Huemer considers three theories
Q9: In his essay, Verbeek responds to what
Q10: Huemer concludes his essay by saying, "It
Q11: In his essay, Bruno Verbeek introduces and