Through Their Replies, It Is Clear That John Corvino Disagrees

Essay

Through their replies, it is clear that John Corvino disagrees with Ryan Anderson and Sherif Girgis on what must be involved in a discriminatory act for it to be harmful. In your essay, explain the nature of these authors' disagreement, drawing from both of their works. Then, offer an explanation of what type of discriminatory act is involved in a case like Bowman-Cryer's (that Corvino discusses in his essay). Do you think Corvino's or Anderson and Girgis' description of harm best fits this case? Why?