In Which of the Following Cases Did the Court Hold

Multiple Choice

In which of the following cases did the court hold that a defendant is not criminally responsible for his or her acts, if at the time he or she committed the acts, he lacks substantial capacity to appreciate the criminality or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law?

A) Montana v. Egelhoff (1996)
B) United States v. Hinckley (1982)
C) United States v. Brawner (1972)
D) State v. Pittman (2007)