Multiple Choice
According to the Court in Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, informing individuals of their right to refuse consent:
A) Was required of the police officer in order for the consent to be voluntary
B) Would run the risk of individuals refusing consent and interfering with police investigations
C) Would weaken the police officer's ability to quickly resolve criminal matters
D) Was not required but would be considered a factor when determining the voluntariness of the consent
E) All of the above except a
F) All of the above except d
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q12: _ are conducted to ensure that individuals
Q13: Which of the following is not a
Q14: Probable cause is required before the police
Q15: Police officers may open and search containers
Q16: What rationale supports warrantless inventory searches? Do
Q18: Police are not required to knock and
Q19: How did the Court apply their holding
Q20: Explain how an individual might benefit from
Q21: Which of the following is not one
Q22: The Carroll doctrine allows for the unwarranted