Multiple Choice
In Wolf v. Colorado, the U.S. Supreme was called on to address whether evidence seized in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments could be used in state court and held that:
A) The exclusionary rule that applied to defendants in federal court also applied to defendants in state court.
B) The exclusionary rule was an explicit requirement of the Fourth Amendment and equally applicable to the state and federal courts.
C) The exclusionary rule was a judiciary creation to expedite the trial process.
D) State courts were not required to exclude from trial evidence that was seized in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q46: The first step taken when challenging the
Q47: The difference between the independent source exception
Q48: One of the arguments against the exclusionary
Q49: In the last 3 decades, the U.S.
Q50: Compare and contrast the independent source exception
Q52: _ is a method created by the
Q53: What two categories of evidence might be
Q54: Federal Agent Smith needs additional evidence to
Q55: In _ the U.S. Supreme Court, held
Q56: A police officer conducted an unlawful search