Molecular Analyses Suggest That the Major Lineages of Animals Diverged

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is An alternative hypothesis to explain the discrepancy between molecular analyses and the fossil record could be that the early animals were soft-bodied and lacked the hard parts necessary for fossilization. This hypothesis suggests that the lack of fossil evidence is not due to the size or larval-like nature of the early animals, but rather their lack of preservation potential.

To test the first hypothesis, scientists could conduct further molecular analyses on a wider range of animal species to refine the divergence dates and compare them to the fossil record. They could also look for potential larval forms in the fossil record that may have been previously overlooked.

To test the alternative hypothesis, researchers could focus on areas with exceptional preservation conditions, such as Lagerstätten deposits, to search for soft-bodied early animal fossils. They could also use advanced imaging techniques, such as CT scanning, to examine fossil specimens for evidence of soft tissues that may not be visible to the naked eye.

By testing both hypotheses, scientists can work towards a better understanding of the early divergence and evolution of animals, and potentially reconcile the discrepancies between molecular and fossil evidence.

Molecular Analyses Suggest That the Major Lineages of Animals Diverged

Essay

Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI

Molecular Analyses Suggest That the Major Lineages of Animals Diverged

Essay

Correct Answer:Answered by ExamLex AIShow Answer

Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI