Multiple Choice
Which of the following is the correct analysis of Coltman v Bibby Tankers?
A) The word 'includes' in that particular Act meant that the list was exhaustive. This was determined by reference to the other sections where lists were given.
B) The word 'includes' in that particular Act meant that the list was non-exhaustive. This was determined by reference to the other sections where lists were given.
C) The case is authority for the proposition that the use of the word 'includes' in a statute will always mean that the list is open-ended.
D) The case is authority for the proposition that the use of the word 'includes' will always mean that the list is exhaustive, so anything not specifically included in the list cannot be read into it.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: Match each rule of interpretation with its
Q10: Section 2 of the Curfew and Civil
Q11: Match each Latin maxim to its meaning.<br>-Eiusdem
Q12: Match each rule of interpretation with its
Q13: When can a statute be read in
Q15: Which of the following statements apply to
Q16: Section 1 of the Curfew and Civil
Q17: Interpretation of a word or phrase, within
Q18: Match each Latin maxim to its meaning.<br>-Expressio
Q19: 'The golden rule is a bridge between