Multiple Choice
Which of the following statements is the most accurate explanation of what the positioning of the names tells us about the case of Baxter v Hirst (2012) , a civil (non-family) case being heard at first instance?
A) Baxter is the claimant and Hirst is the defendant.
B) Baxter is the plaintiff and Hirst is the defendant.
C) Baxter is the claimant and Hirst is the respondent.
D) Baxter is the applicant and Hirst is the defendant.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: The purpose in passing a Statute Law
Q19: Match the type of title with its
Q20: Match each word with its definition.<br>-Distinguished.<br>A) This
Q21: Schedules can be found at the end
Q22: Match each word with its definition.<br>-Considered.<br>A) This
Q23: Distinguishing is called 'restrictive' where the judge
Q24: Match each word with its definition.<br>-Extempore.<br>A) The
Q25: The date of commencement of an Act
Q26: Cases before the European Court of Justice
Q28: In the European Court of Justice, the