Multiple Choice
What is a common critique of traditional research methods of testing significance, other than publication bias? Choose the best answer.
A) incorrect statistical techniques
B) misleading conclusion on presence of a null effect
C) misleading usage of a confidence interval
D) erroneous calculation of the point estimate
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: What could be done to minimize faulty
Q10: Using the paper chosen in question 1,
Q11: A confidence level of 99% is interpreted
Q12: If the p value of the hypothesis
Q13: Explain what is a 'statistically significant' result
Q15: Distinguish between interpreting a confidence interval and
Q16: What is an alternative term used in
Q17: What is a confidence interval of a
Q18: What is the statistical measure generally shown
Q19: What does the value of 'R' represent