Multiple Choice
What is the strongest way to describe the impact of 2 Peter 1:21 on the doctrine of inspiration? The language of 2 Peter 1:21 . . .
A) does not lend itself well to a "mechanical dictation" theory of inspiration.
B) does not require a "mechanical dictation" theory of inspiration.
C) strongly suggests a "mechanical dictation" theory of inspiration.
D) absolutely rules out a "mechanical dictation" theory of inspiration.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: Which of the following terms best describes
Q14: Your textbook defends which of the following
Q15: 2 Peter is notable for its use
Q16: Which of the following is most likely
Q17: What sin in the preconversion lives of
Q19: Which of the following is NOT a
Q20: Which of the following does your textbook
Q21: In 2 Peter 3:15-16, Paul's letters are
Q22: Who interprets the words in and for
Q23: 2 Peter was likely intended for a