Multiple Choice
Which of the following best explains why drawing analogies between two actions can lead to a particular moral conclusion about one of them?
A) People must be able to depend on others' consistent judgment from one case to the next, and so it is important not to change your mind about your moral judgments.
B) Because, as the American philosopher Ralph Waldo Emerson said, "consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds."
C) If two things are similar enough in nonmoral ways, then it would be inconsistent or even hypocritical to make different moral judgments about them.
D) By provoking moral intuitions related to one action, the argument can provoke similar moral intuitions about the second action.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: To determine whether two actions are relevantly
Q9: In the conclusion of GENERIC ARGUMENT FOR
Q10: Why do the similarities between two actions
Q11: Which of the following best explains the
Q12: In your own words, explain Judith Jarvis
Q14: Arguments by analogy rely on the idea
Q15: A refutation by logical analogy is a
Q16: What is an evolving analogy? When might
Q17: A refutation by logical analogy is:<br>A) An
Q18: What kind of moral arguments depend on