Multiple Choice
While thinking about the principle that it is always wrong to torture people, the philosopher Henry Shue imagines a scenario in which torturing a suspect is the only way to save Paris from being destroyed by a nuclear bomb. Based on the discussion in Chapter 6, which of the following would NOT be a plausible way for Shue to respond to that alleged counterexample?
A) Insist that, although it would lead to disaster, the police are still morally obligated to refrain from torturing the suspect.
B) Revise the principle to say that it is always wrong to torture people unless the would-be torturer is extremely confident that it is the only way to prevent a great catastrophe.
C) Argue that although torturing the suspect would violate the would-be torturer's obligation not to torture, the obligation to save Paris is more important in this particular case.
D) Add some detail to the scenario so that torturing the suspect would no longer guarantee that Paris would be saved.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q28: What point is Robert Nozick trying to
Q29: Which of the following best captures the
Q30: The doctrine of double effect says that
Q31: Philosophers often use thought experiments to see
Q32: What point is Mencius's disciple trying to
Q34: What is the point of Robert Nozick's
Q35: Which of the following is most plausibly
Q36: The doctrine of double effect is that
Q37: Which of the following is a reason
Q38: In your own words, explain the principle