Why, According, to Metz, Is It Wrong to Argue Against

Multiple Choice

Why, according, to Metz, is it wrong to argue against capital punishment on the grounds of potential miscarriages of justice?

A) The empirical evidence that miscarriages of justice frequently occur is ambiguous and inconclusive.
B) The execution of the innocent can still be justified on the basis of the death penalty's overall deterrent value.
C) Miscarriages of justice are inherent to any form of punishment and are not unique to the death penalty.
D) This would wrongly entail that just cases of the use of deadly force for defensive purposes would be unjustified.