True/False
According to Metz, one may be justified in the use of deadly force in defense of oneself or others even if one lacks certainty that failure to use such force would result in harm.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Related Questions
Q395: Collins argues that principles should have no
Q396: A significant objection, according to Shue, against
Q397: Thomson's position on abortion depends on a
Q398: Which of the following best captures Sinnott-Armstrong's
Q399: Explain in your own words Shue's concept
Q401: In your own words, explain Dougherty's substantive
Q402: Which of the following is an example
Q403: Which of the following best captures the
Q404: What conclusion about "killing" versus "letting die"
Q405: A key premise of Metz's argument against