Multiple Choice
Singer's main conclusion in this paper is:
A) We have an obligation to prevent bad things from happening by sacrificing other things of comparable moral significance.
B) We have an obligation to prevent bad things from happening if it is in our power to do so and it does not require us to sacrifice anything of comparable moral importance.
C) We have an obligation to sacrifice our own interests to prevent bad things from happening to others.
D) We have an obligation to help those closest to us rather than those far away because the needs of people near us psychologically impact us more.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q133: How does Strawser respond to the objection
Q134: Broome agrees with Greenpeace that offsetting your
Q135: Rachels argues that it is incorrect to
Q136: Which of the following best captures the
Q137: Norcross argues that one's inability to be
Q139: Why does Steinbock discuss Singer's argument in
Q140: Krakoff highlights two kinds of impacts from
Q141: Why, according to Metz, is the potential
Q142: Why does Gay-Williams discuss the possibility of
Q143: Warren denies that fetuses, as potential persons,