Multiple Choice
Assume that Nell is correct that third parties have a duty to enforce other's right not to be killed. Which of the following could you infer from that claim?
A) People may have duties to change their social and political institutions, including states and international organizations, to better enforce people's right not to be killed.
B) If person A kills person B in self-defense, then B's right not to be killed is violated although A's actions are morally permissible.
C) People have duties to enforce the laws within their own countries to prevent the deaths of their fellow citizens but do not have duties to prevent deaths in other countries.
D) The duty to enforce person A's right not to be killed will require that one kills others who are trying to kill
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1019: According to Mill, what is the relationship
Q1020: According to Eaton, the harm hypothesis does
Q1021: A hypothetical imperative is:<br>A) An imperative that
Q1022: Abbate argues that the only civilians who
Q1023: Dougherty main conclusion in this paper is:<br>A)
Q1025: Wiredu defines morality as the observance of
Q1026: Which of the following would count as
Q1027: Why does Garcia think that prejudice is
Q1028: What is Broome's basic conclusion in "Private
Q1029: How does Wiredu define morality?<br>A) As the