Multiple Choice
Which of the following can we infer from Rachels's claim that outside the realm of medicine, most cases of killing are more reprehensible than most cases where one is allowed to die?
A) In most cases of killing outside of medical contexts the killer's intentions are more reprehensible than the intentions of one who simply allows another to die.
B) Unlike cases of killing outside of medical contexts, in most cases of allowing one to die outside of medical contexts, the victim's death is not an intended consequence.
C) Unlike most cases of killing within medical contexts, in most cases of letting someone die within medical contexts, the patient's death is not an intended consequence.
D) In most cases of active euthanasia, the doctor's intentions are not any more or less reprehensible than the intentions of a doctor who allows a patient to die.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1025: Wiredu defines morality as the observance of
Q1026: Which of the following would count as
Q1027: Why does Garcia think that prejudice is
Q1028: What is Broome's basic conclusion in "Private
Q1029: How does Wiredu define morality?<br>A) As the
Q1031: Which of the following can we infer
Q1032: Woollard argues that if there is a
Q1033: Marquis claims that it is wrong to
Q1034: What point is Mencius making in the
Q1035: According to Mill, why is it wrong