Multiple Choice
Which of the following best expresses the basic question that Cheryl Abbate is trying to answer in "Assuming Risk: A Critical Analysis of a Soldier's Duty to Prevent Collateral Casualties"?
A) When are soldiers obligated to avoid collateral casualties?
B) Do soldiers or commanders have a greater obligation to decide which risks are appropriate for avoiding collateral casualties?
C) Do soldiers have a moral obligation to assume extra risks to avoid collateral casualties?
D) Is it permissible to injure or kill civilians as a foreseen side effect of achieving a legitimate military objective?
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q326: Woollard makes an independent argument in her
Q327: What is the connection, according to Sinnott-Armstrong,
Q328: In your own words, state, according to
Q329: Which of the following, according to Dershowitz,
Q330: Thomson argues that the right to life
Q332: Which of the following best captures the
Q333: Woollard's main conclusion in this paper is:<br>A)
Q334: According to Wolf, the mere risk of
Q335: Which of the following is NOT an
Q336: Which of the following would count as