True/False
Proponents of reflective equilibrium in ethical thinking argue that a theory or set of moral beliefs is justified if it maximizes the coherence of the overall set of beliefs that are accepted upon reflective examination.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Related Questions
Q26: At what point can a moral judge
Q27: _ _, as a form of ethical
Q28: Beauchamp and Childress call their own model
Q29: What is one way Beauchamp and Childress
Q30: Which of the following do Beauchamp and
Q32: Beauchamp and Childress argue that a theory
Q33: Why is the common morality better suited
Q34: What is the main thesis of thinkers
Q35: According to Beauchamp and Childress, what is
Q36: How do Beauchamp and Childress's four principles