Thomas Nagel is professor of philosophy at New York University and the author of several works in moral and political philosophy. In this selection Nagel challenges the Kantian way of viewing morality, which assumes that we are all equal rational participants in the moral enterprise, each having the same opportunity to be moral. Nagel suggests that this view is simplistic and fails to take into account the manner in which external factors impinge upon us. They introduce the idea of moral luck, which he defines thus: "Where a significant aspect of what someone does depends on factors beyond his control, yet we continue to treat him in that respect as an object of moral judgment, it can be called moral luck." Four types of moral luck are considered: constitutive luck, circumstantial luck, consequential luck in which consequences retrospectively justify an otherwise immoral act (or fail to justify an otherwise moral act), and consequential luck in which the consequences affect the type of blame or remorse (or moral praise). -Nagel thinks that our notion of moral responsibility is

A) plausible. B) workable. C) useful. D) incoherent.

Thomas Nagel is professor of philosophy at New York University and the author of several works in moral and political philosophy. In this selection Nagel challenges the Kantian way of viewing morality, which assumes that we are all equal rational participants in the moral enterprise, each having the same opportunity to be moral. Nagel suggests that this view is simplistic and fails to take into account the manner in which external factors impinge upon us. They introduce the idea of moral luck, which he defines thus: "Where a significant aspect of what someone does depends on factors beyond his control, yet we continue to treat him in that respect as an object of moral judgment, it can be called moral luck." Four types of moral luck are considered: constitutive luck, circumstantial luck, consequential luck in which consequences retrospectively justify an otherwise immoral act (or fail to justify an otherwise moral act), and consequential luck in which the consequences affect the type of blame or remorse (or moral praise). -Nagel says that our "prior to reflection" intuition is that people cannot be

A) the victim of luck. B) morally assessed for what is not their fault. C) guilty. D) lucky.

Thomas Nagel is professor of philosophy at New York University and the author of several works in moral and political philosophy. In this selection Nagel challenges the Kantian way of viewing morality, which assumes that we are all equal rational participants in the moral enterprise, each having the same opportunity to be moral. Nagel suggests that this view is simplistic and fails to take into account the manner in which external factors impinge upon us. They introduce the idea of moral luck, which he defines thus: "Where a significant aspect of what someone does depends on factors beyond his control, yet we continue to treat him in that respect as an object of moral judgment, it can be called moral luck." Four types of moral luck are considered: constitutive luck, circumstantial luck, consequential luck in which consequences retrospectively justify an otherwise immoral act (or fail to justify an otherwise moral act), and consequential luck in which the consequences affect the type of blame or remorse (or moral praise). -Thomas Nagel argues that the Kantian way of viewing morality is

A) superior. B) simplistic. C) logical. D) complete.

Thomas Nagel is professor of philosophy at New York University and the author of several works in moral and political philosophy. In this selection Nagel challenges the Kantian way of viewing morality, which assumes that we are all equal rational participants in the moral enterprise, each having the same opportunity to be moral. Nagel suggests that this view is simplistic and fails to take into account the manner in which external factors impinge upon us. They introduce the idea of moral luck, which he defines thus: "Where a significant aspect of what someone does depends on factors beyond his control, yet we continue to treat him in that respect as an object of moral judgment, it can be called moral luck." Four types of moral luck are considered: constitutive luck, circumstantial luck, consequential luck in which consequences retrospectively justify an otherwise immoral act (or fail to justify an otherwise moral act), and consequential luck in which the consequences affect the type of blame or remorse (or moral praise). -According to Nagel, the problem of moral luck is based on the conflict between (i) our intuition that someone's moral status cannot be altered by luck and (ii) the possibility that luck

A) can indeed affect someone's moral status. B) is destructive of moral decision-making. C) plays no role at all. D) makes morality obsolete.

Thomas Nagel is professor of philosophy at New York University and the author of several works in moral and political philosophy. In this selection Nagel challenges the Kantian way of viewing morality, which assumes that we are all equal rational participants in the moral enterprise, each having the same opportunity to be moral. Nagel suggests that this view is simplistic and fails to take into account the manner in which external factors impinge upon us. They introduce the idea of moral luck, which he defines thus: "Where a significant aspect of what someone does depends on factors beyond his control, yet we continue to treat him in that respect as an object of moral judgment, it can be called moral luck." Four types of moral luck are considered: constitutive luck, circumstantial luck, consequential luck in which consequences retrospectively justify an otherwise immoral act (or fail to justify an otherwise moral act), and consequential luck in which the consequences affect the type of blame or remorse (or moral praise). -Nagel says, "Where a significant aspect of what someone does depends on factors beyond his control, yet we continue to treat him in that respect as an object of moral judgment, it can be called

A) God's will." B) moral luck." C) absurdity." D) strange."

Exam 68: Thomas Nagel: Moral Luck

Study Flashcards

showing 1 - 15 of 15

Related Exams

Exam 1

Plato: Socratic Wisdom

10 Questions

Exam 2

Plato: The Allegory of the Cave

15 Questions

Exam 3

John Locke: of Enthusiasm and the Quest for Truth

15 Questions

Exam 4

Bertrand Russell: The Value of Philosophy

15 Questions

Exam 5

Thomas Aquinas: The Five Ways

12 Questions

Exam 6

William Lane Craig: The Kalam Cosmological Argument and the Anthropic Principle

9 Questions

Exam 7

Paul Edwards: A Critique of the Cosmological Argument

15 Questions

Exam 8

William Paley: The Watch and the Watchmaker

9 Questions

Exam 9

David Hume: A Critique of the Teleological Argument

14 Questions

Exam 10

ST Anselm and Gaunilo: The Ontological Argument

13 Questions

Exam 11

William Rowe: an Analysis of the Ontological Argument

11 Questions

Exam 12

Fyodor Dostoevsky: Why Is There Evil

15 Questions

Exam 13

B.C.Johnson: Why Doesnt God Intervene to Prevent Evil

15 Questions

Exam 14

John Hick: There Is a Reason Why God Allows Evil

8 Questions

Exam 15

William L Rowe: the Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism

12 Questions

Exam 16

Blaise Pascal: Yes, Faith Is a Logical Bet

10 Questions

Exam 17

Wk Clifford: The Ethics of Belief

15 Questions

Exam 18

William James: The Will to Believe

10 Questions

Exam 19

Alvin Plantinga: Religious Belief Without Evidence

15 Questions

Exam 20

Michael Martin: Faith and Foundationalism

15 Questions

Exam 21

Søren Kierkegaard: Faith and Truth

15 Questions

Exam 22

Bertrand Russell: Can Religion Cure Our Troubles

15 Questions

Exam 23

René Descartes: Cartesian Doubt and the Search for Foundational Knowledge

4 Questions

Exam 24

John Locke: The Empiricist Theory of Knowledge

8 Questions

Exam 25

George Berkeley: an Idealist Theory of Knowledge

11 Questions

Exam 26

David Hume: The Origin of Our Ideas

5 Questions

Exam 27

G E Moore: Proof of an External World

15 Questions

Exam 28

Bertrand Russell: The Correspondence Theory of Truth

15 Questions

Exam 29

William James: The Pragmatic Theory of Truth

15 Questions

Exam 30

Richard Rorty: Dismantling Truth: Solidarity Versus Objectivity

15 Questions

Exam 31

Daniel Dennett: Postmodernism and Truth

15 Questions

Exam 32

Eve Browning Cole: Philosophy and Feminist Criticism

15 Questions

Exam 33

Alison Ainley: Feminist Philosophy

14 Questions

Exam 34

David Hume: Skeptical Doubts Concerning the Operations of the Understanding

6 Questions

Exam 35

Wesley C Salmon: The Problem of Induction

15 Questions

Exam 36

René Descartes: Substance Dualism

8 Questions

Exam 37

Gilbert Ryle: Exorcising Descartess Ghost in the Machine

15 Questions

Exam 38

J.P.Moreland: A Contemporary Defense of Dualism

15 Questions

Exam 39

Paul Churchland: on Functionalism and Materialism

15 Questions

Exam 40

JJC Smart: Sensations and Brain Processes

12 Questions

Exam 41

Thomas Nagel: What Is It Like to Be a Bat

12 Questions

Exam 42

Jerry a Fodor: The Mindbody Problem

10 Questions

Exam 43

David Chalmers: Property Dualism

13 Questions

Exam 44

John Searle: Minds, Brains, and Computers

11 Questions

Exam 45

Ned Block: Troubles With Functionalism

9 Questions

Exam 46

John Locke: Our Psychological Properties Define the Self

15 Questions

Exam 47

David Hume: We Have No Substantial Self With Which We Are Identical

14 Questions

Exam 48

Baron Dholbach: We Are Completely Determined

10 Questions

Exam 49

William James: The Dilemma of Determinism

13 Questions

Exam 50

Roderick M.Chisholm: Human Freedom and the Self

15 Questions

Exam 51

Harry Frankfurt: Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person

15 Questions

Exam 52

David Hume: Liberty and Necessity

15 Questions

Exam 53

Wt Stace: Compatibilism

13 Questions

Exam 54

Ruth Benedict: Morality Is Relative

15 Questions

Exam 55

James Rachels: Morality Is Not Relative

13 Questions

Exam 56

Plato: Why Should I Be Moral Gygess Ring and Socratess Dilemma

15 Questions

Exam 57

Louis P Pojman: Egoism and Altruism: A Critique of Ayn Rand

14 Questions

Exam 58

Joel Feinberg: Psychological Egoism

13 Questions

Exam 59

Immanuel Kant: The Moral Law

8 Questions

Exam 60

John Stuart Mill: Utilitarianism

7 Questions

Exam 61

Russ Shafer-Landau: Consequentialism: Its Difficulties

14 Questions

Exam 62

Aristotle: The Ethics of Virtue

9 Questions

Exam 63

Virginia Held: The Ethics of Care

9 Questions

Exam 64

Alison M.Jaggar: Feminist Ethics

15 Questions

Exam 65

Annette C.Baier: The Need for More Than Justice

12 Questions

Exam 66

Jean-Paul Sartre: Existentialist Ethics

8 Questions

Exam 67

James Rachels: The Divine Command Theory

15 Questions

Exam 69

Susan Wolf: Moral Saints

13 Questions

Exam 70

Robert Paul Wolff: In Defense of Anarchism

15 Questions

Exam 71

Thomas Hobbes: The Absolutist

9 Questions

Exam 72

John Locke: The Democratic

4 Questions

Exam 73

John Stuart Mill: A Classical Liberal Answer

15 Questions

Exam 74

John Rawls: The Contemporary Liberal Answer

9 Questions

Exam 75

Robert Nozick: Against Liberalism

15 Questions

Exam 76

Martin Luther King Jr: Nonviolence and Racial Justice

13 Questions

Exam 77

Susan Moller Okin: Justice, Gender, and the Family

15 Questions

Exam 78

Mary Wollstonecraft: A Vindication of the Rights of Women

15 Questions

Exam 79

Epicurus: Moderate Hedonism

15 Questions

Exam 80

Epictetus: Stoicism: Enchiridion

15 Questions

Exam 81

Albert Camus: Life Is Absurd

14 Questions

Exam 82

Julian Baggini: Living Life Forward

9 Questions

Exam 83

Louis P Pojman: Religion Gives Meaning to Life

15 Questions

Exam 84

Thomas Nagel: The Absurd

15 Questions

Exam 85

Richard Taylor: The Meaning of Life

15 Questions

Exam 86

Susan Wolf: Meaning in Life

15 Questions

Exam 87

Don Marquis: Why Abortion Is Immoral

11 Questions

Exam 88

Francis J Beckwith: Arguments From Bodily Rights

15 Questions

Exam 89

Mary Anne Warren: on the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion

12 Questions

Exam 90

Judith Jarvis Thomson: A Defense of Abortion

11 Questions

Exam 91

Jane English: The Moderate Position: Beyond the Personhood Argument

12 Questions

Exam 92

Burton Leiser: The Death Penalty Is Permissible

15 Questions

Exam 93

Hugo Adam Bedau: No, the Death Penalty Is Not Morally Permissible

15 Questions

Exam 94

Lawrence Blum: Racism: Its Core Meaning

14 Questions

Exam 95

Kwame Anthony Appiah: Racisms

11 Questions

Exam 96

Peter Singer: Famine, Affluence, and Morality

15 Questions

Exam 97

Garrett Hardin: Living on a Lifeboat

91 Questions