Essay
Consider a scenario in which a highly selective school wanted to improve its selection of prospective students. A consultant developed a new predictor with an internal consistency reliability of .75. The consultant then correlated the new measure with a criterion of student success, and found that the resulting correlation was .39. Prior to reporting the results, the consultant considered whether corrections for attenuation due to unreliability should be performed in the predictor, the criterion, neither, or both. Provide a recommendation explaining how the consultant should proceed.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: To improve prediction over random selection, the
Q2: Using Cohen's (1988) guidelines to evaluate the
Q4: The correction of artifacts impacting the predictor
Q5: _ criterion-related validation designs typically provide the
Q6: Construct irrelevant variance is closely tied to
Q7: _ criterion-related validation designs require considerably more
Q8: A small organization which has too few
Q9: (a) Explain why restriction in range in
Q10: Roth et al. (2017) found that the
Q11: In a _ criterion-related validation study, scores