Short Answer
Think with Socrates does not contain a section on enthymemes. However, the concept can be defined briefly. This exercise defines an enthymeme and gives students a chance to practice filling in holes in incomplete deductive arguments.
An enthymeme is an argument that is missing one or more premises or a conclusion. Each of the following deductive arguments is missing either a premise or a conclusion. (Thus, each is an enthymeme.) Add a statement to each so as to turn the enthymeme into a valid argument.
-All biologists are scientists, and all scientists are intellectually disciplined people. So …
Correct Answer:

Answered by ExamLex AI
An enthymeme, as mentioned, is a form of...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q1: An IBE is inductive in nature.
Q2: Assume each of the following is a
Q3: The following is a valid argument: Senator
Q4: If an argument is cogent, then it
Q6: The only combination you will never find
Q7: Think with Socrates does not contain a
Q8: Does Aristotle deserve his title, "founder of
Q9: Is the argument deductive (D) or inductive
Q10: On deductive arguments.<br>-If an argument is valid,
Q11: One way to strengthen a generalization from