Essay
Think with Socrates does not contain a section on enthymemes. However, the concept can be defined briefly. This exercise defines an enthymeme and gives students a chance to practice filling in holes in incomplete deductive arguments.
An enthymeme is an argument that is missing one or more premises or a conclusion. Each of the following deductive arguments is missing either a premise or a conclusion. (Thus, each is an enthymeme.) Add a statement to each so as to turn the enthymeme into a valid argument.
-All bats are mammals … Therefore, all bats are warm-blooded.
Correct Answer:

Answered by ExamLex AI
The concept of enthymemes is not covered...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q44: Categorical arguments are a common type of
Q45: One way to strengthen an enumerative induction
Q46: In an inference to the best explanation,
Q47: On deductive arguments.<br>-If a deductive argument is
Q48: Is all reasoning equal? Or is some
Q50: One way to critique an analogical argument
Q51: On deductive arguments.<br>-If an argument has premises
Q52: If an argument has premises that are
Q53: Think with Socrates does not contain a
Q54: The following is a valid argument: Senator