Short Answer
Think with Socrates does not contain a section on enthymemes. However, the concept can be defined briefly. This exercise defines an enthymeme and gives students a chance to practice filling in holes in incomplete deductive arguments.
An enthymeme is an argument that is missing one or more premises or a conclusion. Each of the following deductive arguments is missing either a premise or a conclusion. (Thus, each is an enthymeme.) Add a statement to each so as to turn the enthymeme into a valid argument.
-If the British march to Lexington and attempt to arrest Sam Adams, then there will be an armed conflict ... There will be an armed conflict.
Correct Answer:

Answered by ExamLex AI
An enthymeme, as mentioned, is a form of...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q216: Inductive arguments are intended to show that
Q217: On deductive arguments.<br>-If an argument is invalid,
Q218: The following argument is valid: All students
Q219: If an argument is inductively strong, then
Q220: The only combination that you will not
Q222: Assume each of the following is a
Q223: Strong or Weak?<br>-Almost every time that Pete
Q224: Is the argument deductive (D) or inductive
Q225: Deductive arguments have an air of certainty,
Q226: If an argument is weak, then its