Short Answer
Think with Socrates does not contain a section on enthymemes. However, the concept can be defined briefly. This exercise defines an enthymeme and gives students a chance to practice filling in holes in incomplete deductive arguments.
An enthymeme is an argument that is missing one or more premises or a conclusion. Each of the following deductive arguments is missing either a premise or a conclusion. (Thus, each is an enthymeme.) Add a statement to each so as to turn the enthymeme into a valid argument.
-If it rains, then the streets will become wet. If it snows, then the streets will become white. Therefore, either it will not rain, or it will not snow.
Correct Answer:

Answered by ExamLex AI
An enthymeme, as mentioned, is a type of...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q171: An argument with a false conclusion cannot
Q172: The following is a valid argument: Britney
Q173: Is the argument deductive (D) or inductive
Q174: If an inductive argument has all true
Q175: The following is a valid argument: Jim
Q177: In your own words, define the academic
Q178: The following argument is valid: All students
Q179: Is the argument deductive (D) or inductive
Q180: More enthymemes. In each case, fill in
Q181: For each set of values, determine the