Short Answer
Think with Socrates does not contain a section on enthymemes. However, the concept can be defined briefly. This exercise defines an enthymeme and gives students a chance to practice filling in holes in incomplete deductive arguments.
An enthymeme is an argument that is missing one or more premises or a conclusion. Each of the following deductive arguments is missing either a premise or a conclusion. (Thus, each is an enthymeme.) Add a statement to each so as to turn the enthymeme into a valid argument.
-Some bats are pets. Therefore, some pets are scary-looking creatures.
Correct Answer:

Answered by ExamLex AI
An enthymeme, as mentioned, is a form of...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q262: On deductive arguments.<br>-If a deductive argument has
Q263: Aristotle studied under Plato.
Q264: If an argument has premises that are
Q265: The following is a strong argument: For
Q266: Assume each of the following is a
Q268: On critically evaluating inductive arguments. Read the
Q269: Think with Socrates does not contain a
Q270: If an argument is strong, then it
Q271: On deductive arguments.<br>-If an argument is deductively
Q272: As an academic subject, logic is the