Short Answer
Think with Socrates does not contain a section on enthymemes. However, the concept can be defined briefly. This exercise defines an enthymeme and gives students a chance to practice filling in holes in incomplete deductive arguments.
An enthymeme is an argument that is missing one or more premises or a conclusion. Each of the following deductive arguments is missing either a premise or a conclusion. (Thus, each is an enthymeme.) Add a statement to each so as to turn the enthymeme into a valid argument.
-If the abominable snowman is a mammal, then not all species of mammals have been discovered. All species of mammals have been discovered. Therefore, …
Correct Answer:

Answered by ExamLex AI
An enthymeme is indeed a type of argumen...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q155: Deductive arguments are intended to show that
Q156: The following is a valid argument: No
Q157: In a generalization from a sample, the
Q158: The Academy was located in:<br>A) Atlantis<br>B) Sparta<br>C)
Q159: The combination you will not find in
Q161: Assume each of the following is a
Q162: Is the argument deductive (D) or inductive
Q163: Is the argument deductive (D) or inductive
Q164: Think with Socrates does not contain a
Q165: Some arguments are invalid but sound.